The Independent Uganda: You get the Truth we Pay the Price
From July 2016 to February 2017 (when BOU sold Crane DFCU) I got deeply involved. One reason was my friendship with Sudhir. The other was my belief that Uganda is better when citizens own a big share of its economy. The third was that I have good personal relations with the top officials of BOU – Governor Emmanuel Tumusiime-Mutebile, his deputy, Louis Kasekende and executive director for bank supervision, Justine Bagyenda. Finally, the Minister of Finance, Matia Kasaija, and President Yoweri Museveni asked me to sit in some of the meetings between BOU and Crane as a citizen with some ideas.
It is through these informal and formal engagements that I realised the strategic deficits at BOU. I draw most of my ideas on strategy from war where the first principle of command is “selection and maintenance of the aim.” What was the main aim of BOU in handling Crane Bank? In my many discussions with BOU officials, I felt they saw their role narrowly, as regulation by enforcing the law. This was largely because BOU relied heavily on its lawyers for advice. So it treated Crane’s issue as a legal rather than a business problem.
Thus, instead of focusing regulatory action towards facilitating Crane to survive and thrive as a business, BOU acted as a policeman enforcing adherence to the law. Without a strategic goal, BOU engaged in a blind and mechanical enforcement of the law thereby harming the business. At the height of Crane’s liquidity crisis in September 2016, I went to Mutebile’s home with a documentary on how the U.S. Federal Reserve and Treasury resolved the crisis of their banks in 2008 – by arranging mergers, even lending money to some banks to buy others. We watched it together.
Thus, while Crane should bear a lot of blame for internal mistakes in the bank, BOU is equally culpable. It had many ways and opportunities of resolving Crane Bank issues without causing the harm they eventually did. They could, as lender of last resort, have loaned Sudhir the Shs165 billion to recapitalise the bank. This would have given Sudhir time (at BOU insistence) to find an equity investor – a solid foreign bank (since BOU does not trust locals) or force a merger with another bank. And there were many interested in the deal. Such a move would have brought in capital, new management skills and better internal controls.
The second problem was a lack of imagination. BOU asked Sudhir to recapitalise Crane within a month, which was unreasonable. To force him to do so quickly, they also stopped Crane from giving out new loans, overdrafts, bid bonds, letters of credit, performance guarantees etc. i.e. from doing any new business. These restrictions added fuel to a burning inferno as customers who could not be served began taking their money out of the bank. Crane ran out of cash to meet the day-to-day demands of her depositors. Hence what began as a capital adequacy problem caused by internal weaknesses of Crane Bank management quickly became a liquidity crisis precipitated by BOU action.
What are the lessons? BOU has managed the growth of our financial sector impressively well. However, the sector has now grown in size and complexity. To grow it further, BOU needs to change how it views its role. For now they see themselves as law enforcers. They need to begin to see themselves as business facilitators.
****
amwenda@independent.co.ug
Africa’s greatest thinker alive…is there a field in which you have no knowledge?
Sasha, this is very flattering. I will buy you a beer if and when we meet
Andrew, as a friend to Mr. Ruparelia, don’t you think you have an actual or perceived conflict of interest in writing this article? Also, having been privy to meetings between BoU and Mr. Ruparelia, discussing your observations from those meetings seems not proper to me unless you obtained their go ahead prior to publishing this. I also believe BoU is mandated to regulate and follow the law as written. This strictness in sticking with the spirit and letter of the law has brought them the success you aptly described. If they had handled the Crane Bank issue in any other way, it would have raised concerns of unfairness in as far as this is not the first bank to go down. Lastly, I believe in capitalism, where companies that are managed well succeed and those managed otherwise collapse. Crane bank fits the latter from what I have read so far.
i truly think that having been part of those meetings, then this advice should have been given in there.
There’s actually conflict if interest
Massaging that ever increasing ego ?. Good thinker me thinks, not GREATEST. Where then would you rank Mandela, Nkurumah, etc.
Great insight!
What would it cost me to get my hands on to that U.S. Federal Reserve documentary?
I will buy you a beer when we meet, which is our destiny for the work we have to carry together. You have been a great teacher, I a petulant student. But I needed to learn some lessons. I wish you would write a plan for Uganda’s industrialisation. Just read about BUBU, so exciting. We can make it and reach out to the rest of Africa and the whole World.
FLATTERY gets you very far.
Look how it has brought out AM from the woodwork.
All along I used to think that he never even bothered to read the comments.
I have seen several times when challenges have been made to him, even most recently by RWASUBUTARE but all went unanswered.
And here goes our SASHA, who hasn’t been around for sometime flattering and the great man and a drink is offered.
They also say the way to a fools heart is flattery
don’t expose him so openly ejakait. we must try with hope that we may rehabilitate him yet. he was a nice guy till recently…. when he started supporting weird ideas and deeds (like the hand-shake) and others which he kept mum when he should have used his forum to speak up. so ejakait, AM is doing sins of commission and omission. but we shall retrieve him. can’t afford to lose him.
I argued at one point that in certain cases one needed to apply political solutions to financial problems.
But this must be in a system that is fair and rational.
My argument was based then on the demise of Premier Building Society, a financial institution that was owned by a Ugandan, Sam Ejangu(rip) back in the 80s.
Sam had been clever enough in that he had registered Premier as a building society but it was operating as though it was a bank mostly in as far as taking deposits were concerned.
But that is where it stopped and he could operate as he wished because he was not under the supervision of BOU
Soon other locally owned banks, most notably ICB of Tom Kato, TEEFE, which was looked at as a Baganda bank and Greenland were all allowed or made to go under where the prudent thing was to let them survive with help from the government / BOU.
The owners of Greenland Bank actually pleaded that they had received capital injection of some US$70 Million from Saudi Arabia but H.E. the Ssaabalwanyi was adamant that the bank must be closed.
This had the unfortunate effect of creating the impression that Ugandans are incapable of managing/owning financial institutions.
Despite all pretentions people look at Sudhir, and he too probably considers himself first and foremost, an Indian or at best British, unless where it suits him to be Ugandan
“””Different sources say President Museveni has given full backing in as far as the prosecution of Sudhir, his daughter Sheena who has been superintending Crane Bank on behalf of his family and the other shareholders of Crane bank are concerned if found guilty.
The forensic investigations are expected to be completed within a month to pin the top individuals who were responsible for causing the massive erosion of capital.
Sudhir is said to be speaking to his friends high up in government asking them to speak to the president in turn to save him from prosecution and attachment of his properties as he races against time.”””” TheUgandan 24/7/2017.
ejakait, methinks this prominent Uganda Citizen called Sudhir was given free-hand to do as he peased and do he did. these are the consequences. Andrew Mwenda; so right in his own eyes and so set in his ways sees more fault by BoU than by his friend; which friend sold a public institution to himself by using proxies and back-door ways to dupe the public. If sincerity is old-fashioned and obsolete in the modern good business practice, then Mwenda and Sudhir are right and it is those who see otherwise BoU included, wrong. But methinks theft, even in politics, the second oldest profession after prostitution is not condoned. Mwenda, Luzira is no respecter of persons.
Two issues raised by Andrew:
1. BOU (the lender of last resort) refused to lend 165b to Cranebank.
2. BOU stopped Crane from giving out new loans, overdrafts, bid bonds, letters of credit, performance guarantees etc. i.e. from doing any new business.
1. Why couldnt Cranebank and Sudhir borrow from other lenders locally or globally? Could this point to creditworthy concerns over Crane bank and Sudhir which one can not blame on BOU?
2. The actions taken under issue no. 2 are clearly written in the financial institutions Act 2004 and are meant to protect customer deposits. Did Andrew expect BOU to act outside the confines of the law to defend his friend in which case customers would have had a very good case against BOU?
Finally the collapse and bailing out of the US banks was due to collapse of the whole sectors and therefore can not be transfered/equated to an isolated bank collapsing due to slef-inflicted internal weaknesses
Crane Bank was controlled by the Ruparelia family at 47 per cent, with MS White Sapphire, a company domiciled in the Mauritius, holding 46 per cent of the shares.
Ms Justine Bagyenda, the executive director supervision at BoU, says the former top management and shareholders of the bank will soon have to explain why the bank became significantly undercapitalised in a space of less than a year.
“There is a forensic investigation going on to find out whether there were people involved in the loss. The investigation will have numbers as well as legal implications,” she said.
In the financial world, forensic audit investigations are often carried out in order to evaluate whether there is enough information to bring the matter to court for criminal proceedings basing on whether there was fraud, embezzlement, excessive insider lending, weak corporate governance and whether financial claims can be made against the individuals responsible.
Monday, July 24, 2017 edition of ‘THEUgandan’
Thanks @ Rwasubutare, point noted
Crane bank,bank of our own????? Sudir is Sudir, Sudir is crane bank,crane bank is Sudir… that is BoU’s main argument, if you lend to crane bank your lending to Sudir… its like someone defrauding you money and asking you to lend him more first so he can do business and pay you back later.. in short its someone “playing” in your own money to get richer at your own cost.
Two other observations;
Sudir has confiscated so many buildings in the name of non performing assets (loans) by many borrowers through his other business arm Crane management services and …its alleged that these include (Somani brothers_Bauman house that now houses MPs,Ferroz Kassam_Speke hotel,Anis mamdani_Namulanda Rose farm,Kampala Parents _Edward Kasole,sese gate way beach,crane bank head office,Riyarz kurji dolphin suites bugolobi,emka house by emma kato, bombo road, Sebagala and sons etc etc…….the small ones i will not mention. WHY DID HE NOT LEND OR CAPITALIZE OR RESTRUCTURE THESE LOANS TO SAVE STRUGGLING UGANDAN BUSINESSMEN, he would argue he is simply following the law,courts would agree in all these takeovers. why now use politics to override the same law?
Mr. Andrew has been inconsistent in the last 5 years,he has thus eroded his trust in public,while some of his arguments may be true,the inconsistency is not proper and has affected you arbitration or cousel.. you may need to be more principled.
Its thus in order for BoU to use the Law as Sudir has been using the law in those takeovers.
OLD MAN of the clan, grow up and live to your name and title. If you continue to side with suspects and speak on their behalf, you will soon lose credibility. Need I tell you that credibility is like virginity; once lost it is gone gone gone irretrievably? When you were still a child,in 1972, one man, who was rumoured to be the richest in Uganda, attempted to bribe another very big man who then ruled Uganda. He was sent to Luzira post-haste and from there, deported. People who were adults then know the details because it was all over Voice of Uganda (the paper). fact: Uganda the nation-state is host to all homeless who come to it; but it is best told to them that “there is a limit to what you can safely eat; risking to vomit it all when you exceed it” paraphrasing Gen. Rukara rwa Magigi (Commander of King Kabalega’s Special Forces) as told by my mentor Irumba.
Some clarity I need from you Andrew Mwenda. Were the actions of Sudhir and his top management in defrauding the bank criminal? Was it possible to rescue the Bank but not Sudhir? Do you not think selling the bank was a way of rescuing the business and not necessarily the name “Crane Bank”? Increase in the volume of business for DFCU is still a win for the local industry. This was not a Bank, it was more of a “ponzi scheme”. Somewhat reminds me of Bernard Madoff.
I think that you are indeed correct in your analysis although the issue is that this is nothing new what be fell crane bank is exactly what happened to Greenland bank and CIB if only they were recapitalized and encouraged to have more frugal and bettet management they would still be here today so in that sense what you say is simply what everyone else has been saying all these years only that this time unlike the previous ones it affected a personal friend of yours.
wouldn’t it serve us better if we talked about “operation wealth creation” and not these small, worthless fights between Museveni and Mbabazi? If one has to kill the other, should we all be dragged in?
I agree with you. Let’s talk about what will lift Uganda, no matter all the political shenanigans
Thank you for your article! Have one question: why should BOU lend sudhir money when he was sending his cash abroad and why is your article silent on this accusation by BOU?
Why are you sugarcoating serious fraud, insider lending, and other crimes by the bank’s greedy owners simply as ‘ internal mistakes in the bank’. A mistake is something that happens accidentally without intent. What Crane owners did was no ‘mistake’. They intended from day one to defraud the Ugandan tax payer. And you are now blaming BOU for having insisted on enforcing the law to stop these crimes?? Besides, I would not trust you as an honest analyst of this issue given your obvious conflict of interest on the side of the bank. We used to see the adverts they used to place in this newspaper, just one example. And If you wanted to demonstrate to the governor examples of bailouts, why didn’t you show him Charles Ferguson’s ‘Inside Job’, probably the best documentary out there on the 2008 global economic meltdown and the role of Key financial institutions in it, and how the U.S taxi payer had to suffer ‘double punishment’ by bailing out the same thugs that screwed their lifetime savings? Mitt Romney in 2011 wrote a New York Times titled ‘Let Detroit Go bankrupt’ which probably led to his loss to Obama in 2012. But it would be appropriate to use it here becuase Sudhir is no industry and I don’t think he should be shown any deference (How many Ugandans, except cooks and handymen at his properties, does he employ?): Let Sudhir go bankrupt; Sell his properties and recover tax payers’ money.
Now someone is talking. Indeed why should Sudhir’s activities of stealing from his bank ie depositors’ money, be not considered serious financial crimes? Is this not a culture of impunity overlaying the whole political/economic ethos of the country. AM blind endorsement is like riding a tiger. I am beginning to feel sorry for him and what is left of his journalistic principles.
1.I love discussions that have economics ,G7 and Law in them they bring out the best in me.
2.With the liberalization of the economy and emergence of rich businessmen, availability of experienced and technical personnel ,BOU and other Banks in the world will have to amend the requirements for one to open up a Bank without shareholders e.g Cant Bill Gates open a bank?why would he need shareholders?Sudhir could have been a victim of such old fashioned requirements where he is forced to form partnership with others for the sake of meeting BOU ‘s requirement.
3.What is BOU after?Clients of Crane Bank have not lost money?The balance of inconvenience is minimal coz Crane Bank paid taxes and employed Ugandans
4.How will BOU prove that Sudhir was the sole proprietor of Crane Bank yet they received the names of shareholders?
5.ICT is a new innovation that is a mother of all fraud there is a possibility that there was deliberate interference with the ICT system by both BOU and Crane BanK thats why some monies could not be accounted for.
6.Why is BOU more interested in the sale of Sudhir’s property and not the sale of his shares in the Stock Market? Has it become a tit for tact game?
7.BOU seems to be in a hurry to dispose off Sudhir’s property what cant wait?the man is even willing to pay why put him under pressure?There are charges one pays when transferring or withdrawing of huge sums of monies if Sudhir didn’t pay let BOU list those transactions.
8.BOU should put a bounty hunt on Kalan the former MD.
9.In Law,there are retainer agreements that can be cancelled or withdrawn if a client for example, fails to honour legal fees or fails to disclose facts that are essential to the case.I guess Masembe the former lawyer of Crane Bank departed ways with his clients on those grounds therefore,Its just unprofessional for Masembe(He was Crane and Barclays Bank’s lawyer) to be the one to be in the team prosecuting his former client.
10.Its good that M7 intervened i time otherwise we risk having our guest poisoned in Munyonyo during conferences.
11.Sasha you better leave Andrew alone if you want peace on this page.
12.Rajab do you have a Bank Account?
I had two which have since been transferred to dfcu (019…48 and …..0009) and another with lloyds tsb (Scotland). Happy???
As we all know sudhir had numerous finacial interestes in Uganda and I suspect a broad too. Given that some of his interests were shared with top people in uganda like his excellency. The take over of the NBC which solely belonged to top dogs in uganda so that news of sudhir empire taking a nose dive was in waiting for people who understand sudhir and his dealings, he can never survive the wrath of the top dogs. He enjoyed in his days dead big deals now it’s time to pay.
Crane Bank was established for one major cause ” to swindle money from ugandan, if thorough and open investigations are carried out on shudhir’s dealings, the results could cause Ugandans to develop stomach runs and high blood pressure. Keeping other sudhir’s dealings under the carpet and talk about crane bank alone is not right, so sudhir has a lot of questions to answer and we know he has alot of top government secrets which he may soon through into the open. The fat deals he got from government and that money deposited in crane bank, all security guards in Iraq, get paid through crane bank and many more big deals he gets, sudhir should stop mourning and just pay back what he owns, and I think this is the beginning of the nose dive,more tricks will be played to flatten him financially Watch this space. .
Oh Mr Mwenda, what an unconvincing apologia for Mr Ruperalia
-First, by stating “friendship” with Mr Ruperalia you jettisoned any semblance of journalistic objectivity
-you refer to the problems inside Crane Bank as “mistakes”; even the most casual follower of the affair knows it is much more than that
-you gloss over the fact that the recapitalization of Crane Bank demanded by BOU was only Shs165b. Surely Mr Ruperalia’s massive real estate holdings are more than adequate to raise, by mortgage or sale, that much money. They are, on paper. But again, there is more to Mr Ruperalia than meets the eye (even the eye, apparently, of a top journalist) It appears that his actual net worth and creditworthiness are at question.
-You paint a picture of BOU as overzealous enforcers. Nobody in Kampala believes this. They gave glowing evaluations to Crane even as all sorts of suspect transactions were going on.
-You neglect to mention the odd actions of other agencies; NSSF failed to notice for years that one of the biggest corporations in the country was not remitting pension contributions for its workers; A very senior government official who is by law not allowed to interfere with management of the central bank apparently arranged meetings in his office between BOU and Mr Ruperalia “to iron out the matter amicably”.
Well sought analysis. Though not agreeing with you lately on politics but this was a masterpiece of economic analysis the old man of the clan. Thank you!
Wasn’t it just? It showed the depth of analysis the Old Man of the clan is capable of. I cannot wait for his views on how to advance the goal of #Bubu in Uganda. The only show in Africa in the 21st century should be about local transformation and deploying innovations aimed at adressing the continent’s dilemmas. Less politics…
The answer to the question of whether banks should be rescued is about economics and incentives. But the problems banks create and how these problems are solved are also a matter of morals and ethics – law and justice. Uganda welcome aboard.
Government support for insolvent banks violates a fundamental principle of economics: We should avoid supporting unprofitable activities. We do not rescue a business that is bankrupt. Instead, we should allow businesses that are profitable to take over. Over time, this improves the conditions for a healthy economy.
When the authorities bail out fraudulent banks, some parties are spared the consequences of their own choices. Bailing out investors and owners using public funds conflicts with people’s ordinary sense of fairness, promotes despotism, corruption to mention.
Moreover, government support for insolvent banks undermines the stability of the financial system. When the authorities bail out banks, the incompetent and fraudulent bank owner merely transfer their losses to others, while reaping the gains in good times.
When the government assumes a substantial portion of bank risk in this way, there is a widespread perception that the authorities in reality stand behind banks, banks may take insufficient account of the risk of losses when making decisions. In particular, the risk that things can go horribly wrong may be underestimated, because banks do not have to bear the consequences of a crisis. By bailing out banks, we in turn reduce the motivation of banks’ owners and creditors to take full account of the risk associated with their activities. The pricing of risk is easily set too low. Banks may therefore end up taking excessive risk.
Government should not reward incompetency whatever the cosmetic benefits.
In making your above statements, firstly you assume, and I’m 100% sure on this, wrongly, that economics is divorced from politics and likewise from the real world
You again make the wrong assumption that economics is an exact science where say 1+1=2, even though this is also not always the case
You seem to be unaware that economics laws or principles are assumptions based on other or a variety of factors and that all these are based on the universal proviso ‘ ceteris paribus ‘ or all things being equal, which they never are.
Sometimes, you can not divorce politics from economics/ finance, that is why we have public goods, subsidies, taxes etc.
Just like you need to make the right call when making economic / financial decisions, you have to make the right political call with issues that involve economics or finance
That is where politics comes in and makes laws that regulate business/economics/finance, and if these are made and regulated fairly and objectively, then all is well.
@ Rajab: Ugandans who have bank accounts in Europe at least have accounts with international banks like Barclays,Stanbic or Standard chartered this means you are telling a lie that you own an account in England.
@Ejakait: Politicians don’t poke their noses in the business of professionals have you ever heard politicians determining interest rates?
@ Bantu what money was swindled from Ugandans have you heard any former client of Crane Bank complain that he lost money?it was Ugandans’ poor paying habits that caused crane bank’s down fall why is BOU not interested in following up those loan defaulters?When Green Land Bank was closed they had to pay clients using money from the treasury(our taxes) MPS and BOU officials did not find it odd was it coz Kggundu was 100% Ugandan?
Barclays,Stanbic always auction property of loan defaulters the only difference between Crane Bank and other international Banks like Barclays is that they are based abroad(there is a way Ugandans quake and respect foreign owned businesses Secondly, banks like Barclays are owned by wealthy shareholders like Sheik Mansour of UAE whom Ugandans dont know if he was based in Ug like Sudhir, we would also think he is a con man.
And you forgot to add Winnie; that Kigundu NEVER transferred his (Greenland’s)earnings outside Uganda….. which Crane and Sudhir have done. To bail out Sudhir and not bail out Kigundu would be more racist than apartheid……. practiced by BLACK men in favour of………. (you can feel in the blanks ejakait)
@ Rwasubutare:Kiggundu had nothing to transfer abroad besides that,there are more business opportunities abroad so don’t blame Sudhir for investing abroad.
BOU was afraid to sell Sudhir’s shares in the stock market coz he would dis-stabilize the economy.
Is it BOU’s role to collect transaction fees for banks or URA?Where is URA in all this?
When ICT systems are off in Ug,just know that dirty deals are being conducted.
Which international banking book are you reading from? I must have missed that headline- my bad.
WINNIE as usual, you are all over the place.
Interest rates is not the only way that the government makes interventions.
I am sure you know that in the UK the government had to bail out most of the banks and some are almost owned by the taxpayer.
I think without going into details , the issue of Crane bank is well above your pay grade and its not worth my while going into arguments with you.
The role of a regulator is to regulate, not to facilitate. If a business needs additional support, be it capital, technology, intellect, expertise, they can bring in additional shareholders, and hire expertise. Facilitation quickly would lead to BOU having a vested interest in the bank, which would inevitably colour the decisions they take on it. This is why auditors are independent – to the extent that they should not provide significant other non-audit services to audit clients. It is quite an elementary practice, and common sense (and experience) tells us that it is the right way to go. Also, to claim that Sudhir and BOU are “equally culpable” in the sad demise of the bank is quite a bold and empirically incorrect statement: One party upheld the law and regulations in the manner it is currently mandated to do (albeit not in the way you suggest they should do), while the other seems to have used his position to fleece the bank to the benefit of his other companies. How can you equate their guilt in the matter?
Sudhir definitely seems to have learnt a thing or two from BCCI, a bank which was set up at the time for purposes of fraud and money laundering and which was wound up eventually but not before they had virtually broken every law in banking.
It had been set up by a Pakistani national and one of the rich Ugandans of Pakistan origin was a beneficiary of an unsecured loan of a reputed £30 m at the time.
He used this money, which was originally in his late wife’s names to buy properties and is reputed to have made her sign transfer forms on her death bed and later had legal battles with her children
Crane Bank was salvaged by BOU, when it was bought over by DFCU. Iam failing to understand Mwenda’s argument? Should top managers, failing the due diligence test, be accorded immunity because of their mistakes worth billions? Mwenda fails to separate the business entity from Sudhir.
Mwenda should know that Bank of Uganda has exercised its regulatory mandate. Its Priority as a regulator is to ensure prudential banking practices. Bank Of Uganda is one regulator that exercises a lot of restraint on Banks. Do you want it to work like UCC which closes FM Stations that host government critics? If Bank of Uganda was sleeping, we would not be having this debate. In terms of failing to lend as a lender of last resort, the Central Bank too, like any lender uses its on credit scored that probably this time round rejected Crane Bank, especially with the kind of management it had. Mwenda should also know that BOU in exercising its supervision roles, develops its own reports and provides the Banks with timelines to repair any anomalies found. Why are you silent on compliance reports that Crane Bank has been receiving from the Central Bank over the years. I think BOU was excessively restrained to take the ultimate action, as it allowed management of the bank, over the years, to make adequate reparations.
Andrew, in your whole article you seem to be blaming BOU for crane bank’s failures. The point is how did crane bank get there. It was deceit by Sudhir from the word go. I think most ugandans would sympathise with banks if they failure b’se of genuine market failure and a sluggish economy like we have now but for for sudhir to siphon money from his bank intentionally was outright theft and therefore malice aforethought. such a person should not be protected and doesnot deserve any soft landing. Let us encourage financial discipline and punish severely financial indiscipline. I think sudhir is lucky that he knows powers that be but seriously what he did would have landed him in jail.
I saw a few comments pointing to Andrew s bias, after reading the article I find it very honest due to the fact that Andrew points out that crane bank made mistakes. Am not even sure I read the whole article as page 2 failed to open.
Some of the mistakes involve land, what Sudhir did is legal as several large companies such as Walmart do the same , the problem is that he used bad legal advice. The core business of crane bank is banking not land, if u look at what Stanbic did, they sold all the ucb properties including the big prize which is now Cham towers.
By the way has anyone read the comments using a phone, the rendering is awful
Yes, Sudhir belongs in jail.
He did what another noted criminal Robert Maxwell, did.
How do you explain the theft of NSSF contributions of his employees.
I remember one time someone was being hounded for NSSF crimes even when he claimed he had not reached the threshold in numbers where one is supposed to comply.
Mugarura, how naive!!! Just because Mwenda states the very obvious, by stating that Crane bank made mistakes, does not make his article objective.
In fact by calling what Crane bank did mistakes is the understatement of the millennium!!!!
There is nothing patently wrong with a financial institution dealing in real estate as long as it is done within the law.
Sudhir used his bank to lure unsuspecting customers to borrow money using their property as security.
The money lent was bank money and the process used to attach and dispose the properties was wrong, which property ended up in the personal ownership of Sudhir with the loan being designated a bad loan, even when the property was attached as recovery.
This nearly befell Dick Kizito who was only saved by state intervention.
Others like Capt Roy among many, were not so lucky.
What is naive is failure to comprehend the basic English I typed. If the land was fraudulently taken that’s the matter for the courts – and that was not the thrust of my argument. English as a foreign second language can be difficult for many people. I can explain to you my take on this matter but I can’t comprehend it for you. A bank’s core business is not land / real estate and what I stated earlier is very simple. It makes business sense to transfer it elsewhere as is a common practice , I did however note that his lawyers or whoever advised him to take the route he did, could have made the advice based on limited legal knowledge, crime or fraud. A smart lawyer could have given him good advice – that can’t be too hard to understand Ejakait, can it ??
From Luzira to a tycoon? Sudhir’s dealings should be investigated not only crane Bank, but also other deals, crane Bank was a mere conduit for dirty cash, nothing less than that. Man was in Luzira for one year for fraudulent deals, so if a criminal like sudhir can be allowed to establish a Bank what would you expect? . Sudhir is just a broker for top people in uganda, if some us can remember a scandal about campy called premera or premier own by sudhir and his excellency so that was one the company sudhir owned and Museveni or NRM has interest in it. It we can recall the basaja balaba scandle museveni him self got in involved on several occasions, and he was on basaja balaba said, alot of cash was lost by Bank of uganda but that is how museveni and many government officials make money, and attribute the cause to the broker. SUDHIR IS JUST A BROKER FOR MUSEVENI.
in other words, he should not have been given an 8 foot pole to open a bank account, let alone own a bank. please remind me of the year he was in jail for 1 year on fraud charges, am becoming old
What I find naive and probably a little stupid is a person who says an article is objective even when by their own admission they only read one page of it.
So your judgement is based on AM admitting that Crane zbank made mistakes, when he actually committed crimes, and reading one page of a two page article.
BRILLIANT
It seems this is the malady (and perverted strategy) of too-big-to-fail afflicting commercial banking. No bank should hold the country hostage to their failures just because if they collapsed the economy too collapses. This is why the global economy was brought to it’s knees — because commercial banks became too big for their own good and the good of everybody else. They’ve put in controls but the banks have started rolling them back to the state of affairs that existed before the great recession. These banks are over-leveraged. They borrow too much with little, threadbare capitalization to support their unscrupulous ways and risky deals and transactions. When they collapse, guess who bails them out? You are right, it’s the tax payers. It is called corporate welfare. If a bank isn’t viable any more let it go under. That is what capitalism and how it works. To keep bailing failing banks is corporate socialism.
Otecho, there is no harm in practising what you have referred to as “corporate socialism”, as long as the practise is a known public policy. What we are currently witnessing in our economy is what Karl Marx viewed capitalism for what it was/is. Marx generally viewed capitalism as the unstable system which only solved the problems it generated by creating even greater obstacles in future. This is so similar to what you have described here as a malady (“too big to fail”). And the eventual outcome was what he described in his famous passage at the end of volume one of ‘Das capital: “Along with the constantly diminishing number of the magnates of capital, who usurp and monopolise all advantages of the process of transformation, grows the mass misery, oppression, slavery, degradation, exploitation; but with this too grows the revolt of the working class, a class always increasing in numbers and discipline, united, organised by the very mechanism of the process of capitalism. The monopoly of capital becomes a fetter upon the mode of production which springs up and flourishes along with, and under it. Centralisation of the means of production and socialisation of labour at last reach a point where they become incompatible with their capitalist integument. The integument is burst. The knell of capitalist private property sounds. The expropriators are expropriated.” From Marx’s passage, one can rightly assert that Sudhir has been “expropriated.”
I what to play the “devil’s advocate” here (not that I am not), in a narrow sense it would appear that I am in support of Mwenda but I what to be “Ugandan” for once. The Central Bank can carry out such operations as may be consequential or incidental to the exercise of its powers and discharge of its duties under a particular Law. Among the many roles/duties of a central Bank is to “supervise and regulate” which is a monetary function. Under this function, the central Bank monitors the activities of cheque clearing and wire transfer services. Which could include; inspecting, supervising and regulating other financial institutions so as to ensure they are sound and safe. The argument is, how did the central Bank let Crane Bank carry out these fictitious dealings without any timely intervention? The only logical conclusion is; “incompetence.” Otherwise it points to an “in-house” connivance with parties within the central bank to defraud the depositors.
The Central bank also acts a “lender of last resort.” Under this duty, the central bank stabilises the economy. It also lends to prevent the ambiguous effects on money supply- preventing banking panics. The closure of a bank has a chilling effect on the investors- it reflects on the performance of the economy. It is therefore in the interests of government through its agency (central Bank) to provide assurances to the investors. It is therefore, very clear that the Central Bank (BOU) not only failed to perform its supervisory and regulatory function but also failed in its duties of lending to Crane Bank which had chilling effects on the economy / portrayed it in bad light.
Sudhir’s companies are among 60 companies in uganda that exempted from paying taxes. So he make a chunk of cash from duty free imports, and swindling money from uganda.
How was a criminal, chief allowed to establish a Bank in uganda. The so called investors are mere chiefs nothing more that, not only sudi, but nearly all foreign investors come to bankrupt our country, uganda is even more exposed to fraud perpetrated by the so called investors, whom museveni is obsessed with. Those chiefs must be apprehended and sent to Luzira.
Andrew, I can’t find the button to edit my comments, any options to edit my comments pls.
Not in a minute, I will ever accept that sudhir own all those investments by himself. Never it can be, sudhir was a poor man just recently until he made contact with his excellency and plans were discussed and sudhir was to turn into Museveni’s top gun. If true then this war is between MUSEVENI vs BANYAKIGEZI, and we know Hon. Amama Mbabazi,Mutebile and many more big guns are part of them. These people lost their bank and that was done within ours, NCB was gone. These Banyakigenzi have money more than any other tribes in ugandans, hence they can get what they want. Finally sudhir will throw in the tawel and go to exile or risk being chewed like peanuts. In all this war it is Mr museveni loosing the battle as Mbabazi digs deeper. It’s easy to cripple museveni’s government financially,subsequently leading to the fall of government. Crane Bank was a good start because that is were Mr museveni does his deals and get money to support NRM, the fall of sudhir might be the beginning of museveni’s nose dive.
The Exponential Law… (Wanting to know everything… ends up knowing nothing). Sometimes thinking that you have knowledge of everything leads you to write such trash…. If BoU is the regulator why shouldnt it exercise its mandate to close Crane bank? was Crane bank the first to be closed? where were you when other bank were being closed? Where is the fiduciary requirement from you a citizen when someone is fraudulently taking our money to his own benefit? is it just because he is your friend?
So u give Sudhir 165m to recapitalise…what happened to the innitial capital anyways? Your thinking is for an ordinary chap… think like an accountant. But then yo not. U r just a know everything guy… ZERO.
wonderful debate but was Terp consultant part of Sudi’s advisors?
The colapse of crane bank is already yelling good information of the network of cartels that crane bank operated, running under the knowledge of sudhir. Sudhir was a conduit for cartels to do the laundering of dirty cash. People like an in a hers who took sh 110 billions from crane bank , how did that happen, now investigations are revealing top secrets for the first time. AMIN HERSI account revealed a series af accounts being operation by her in crane bank and the manor in which that monies was moved to various account in different region of the world is very very suspicious. This lady is just a front for big guns in government, now that the beans have spilled out, let us just waint for the burble to bust. Too much plunder where is actually uganda hending to? Disaster or catastrophe?
Amina HERSI
I like this article from Andrew. Atleast you have blamed both crane bank management and Bou all together. Both had what they couldn’t do right.
Phil has been writing for Pc Gamer for nearly a decade, starting out as
a freelance writer overlaying every thing from free games to MMOs.
All that stated, I definitely disagree with Mark
Zuckerberg-and this current HackerNoon writer (Sarvasv Kulpati)-that privacy is
dead and that we’ve chosen to kill it. For instance, in case you have licensed a photograph
of your self, chances are you’ll not assert your proper of privateness to have the photograph removed
from additional distribution. The diversion from unwanted emotions
by on a regular basis exercise helps you could have a ball when ultimate your brain from in a concise time.
But not like today’s escape rooms, “Myst”
was strictly single-participant and had no time limits on any of the puzzles, meaning people may get pleasure from the game at a cushty tempo.
At Rummy Cash Games, you’ll be able to compete with money rummy players from throughout the nation at any time and
win huge. This may be accomplished within the copyright notice, however could
also be famous on the website where the work is
printed.
• Free Web Arcade :: Thousands of free on-line games.
As before, you can play these items without cost proper inside your
net browser via the Internet Archive. When she arrives
in Elk, Frigg worries that the slower tempo of life will
be boring (they don’t even have the web), but shortly discovers nothing
could possibly be farther from the reality! Some may even learn Blu-rays and DVDs, so you can watch your whole bodily movie
catalog with out shopping for a separate disc player.
The overwhelming charm of pixelated graphics encompass your complete
world and adventure in a unique fantasy JRPG. These events can rotate the entire degree, create black holes in the middle of the map, and rather more!
Learning extra about how folks think, work, and feel can assist you discover their
strengths and weaknesses so you’ll be able to perceive how to work with them better.
And that i preferred the stress in a manner, possibly strain is the unsuitable phrase for it, but the motivation to exit
and use these expertise that I had from work to attempt to make issues that have
been greater than the sum of their components. But it’s a fun mental exercise to figure it out.
But wanna input on few general things, The website design and style is perfect, the content is real
fantastic :D.
my page Peak Keto Ingredients
Aw, this was an exceptionally good post. Taking the time and actual effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I
put things off a lot and don’t seem to get nearly anything done.
However, Bond’s traditional vesper martini isn’t
the only martini choice on the market, and this list of 21 martini cocktails is
proof of that. Rework the classic iced tea and lemonade
mixture into a refreshing frozen vodka cocktail. Bitters,
the complex alcohol-primarily based ingredient that units off the flavor of many cocktails,
may even are available in handy as you stir or shake up many classic cocktails-and they final as much
as 5 years at room temperature. If you cannot swim to
safety, and the shark bites, it is time for the gloves
to come back off. We’ve rounded up some of our favorite canned
cocktails so you understand what to search for subsequent time you’re at the liquor store.
Once upon a time Duende bushes have been a part of it.
There’s plenty of shisha lounge that give hookah smoking sessions with a terrific
quantity of individuals through the globe. You in all probability
don’t want a recipe for a vodka soda or vodka tonic, however the
vodka cocktails below will provide you with a lot of recent concepts for
utilizing up the bottle that’s been sitting in your
cabinet.
Many groups accept as true that they have no option to
get a personal loan if they have bad credit, theres high-quality information for you.
Tip: If you are a teenager, it is important to understand that once your name is on a credit card or debit card, you are beginning
to build up a credit history that will follow you for decades.
These citizens are deemed as high risk borrowers and most of the
banks or financial institutes are hesitant to lend them money.