The Independent Uganda: You get the Truth we Pay the Price
Kampala, Uganda | THE INDEPENDENT | The demolition of St Peters church, Ndeeba was the climax of a four-decade property wrangle between the Church of Uganda and the joint administrators of the estate of the late Evelyn Nachwa, a Buganda Kingdom Princess.
Available documents indicate that in 2008, the joint administrators who include Dan Ssemanga, John Kajoba, Edward Bulunga and Steven Nakibinge, sued the Church of Uganda, the Commissioner of Land Registration and other parties accusing them of fraudulently registering the said land in names of Bishop Danistan Nsubuga, Rev Yuda Kitaka, and Esau Kizito.
But the case was never disposed of, until August 21, 2019, when the High Court Land Division ruled that the land in question was still in the vested interest of the late Evelyn (Evarini) Nachwa and that it had been fraudulently registered in the names of Bishop Danistan Nsubuga, Rev Yuda Kitaka, and Esau Kizito. Court further ordered the commissioner Land registration to return the duplicate certificate of title with respect to the suit to the administrators of the estate of the late Evelyn Nachwa.
“An order for vacant possession is granted in favour of the plaintiff. A permanent injunction is hereby granted restraining the defendant or anybody claiming through them from carrying out any activity on the suit land or alienating the same,” the ruling reads in part.
It was consented by Lawyer James Nangwala on behalf of Nangwala, Rezida and company advocates as the counsel for the plaintiff, Ambrose Tebyasa on behalf of the administrators of the estates of Bishop Danistan Nsubuga, Rev Yuda Kitaka, and Esau Kizito. It was also consented by a representative of Nyanzi Kiboneka and Mbabazi advocates, on behalf of the registered trustees of the Church of Uganda.
Last month, the plaintiff in the matter went back to the court seeking an order to demolish the Church structure on the land in question which Justice John Eudes Keitirima so granted. The decision by Justice Eudes Keitirima was based on the fact that the administrators of the estate had been declared rightful owner of the property, last year.
“I find the order superfluous. Once a party is declared the rightful owner of the suit premises and is give vacant possession of the same, he or she is at liberty to use the land as she or he wishes. If she or he found there structures she or he do need he or she is at liberty to demolish them,” Justice Keitirima’s ruling dated July 10, 2020 reads in part.
Basing on the ruling, and the application to demolish the structure, the acting Kampala Capital City Authority physical planner Ivan Katongole gave a green light on the demolition.
However, Katongole gave strict guidelines to the redeveloper in names of Ephraim enterprises to ensure that no person is occupying the building before it is demolished, and ensure other safety measures for the neighbouring community during the exercise. Katongole also noted that the demolition had to happen over the weekend “and off-peak hours to avoid interruptions of traffic and other businesses within the vicinity of the site.”
********
URN
Ok, with this your article, you bring to light the background to the demolition, and which background is not made public until now and which has led to a big outcry.
My issue is the timing and how the demolition was carried out namely under the cover of night and worse still when there is a curfew in place.
The Police Station which has jurisdiction of the area where the church is located, failed in its duty to ensure the court order is carried out in an orderly manner, and thus bringing contempt upon itself and the government at large.
What exactly are you trying to argue? Is there a law against demolitions at night? Didn’t you read the Judges’ order, which recommended demolition during “off-peak hours”? What better time is off-peak than night time? How are you sure that they did not have authorisation to demolish during a curfew? After all some activities and businesses are exempted from curfew limitations.
The owner of the land has every right to do whatever they want to do with their property, and in this case followed the judges’ recommendations. This wailing of oh-so-concerned citizens doesn’t change that. Shrines are burnt everyday by zealous Christians and we never see this misinformed noise!
Nonsense always remains nonsense even when masked by the law.
Ignorance always remains ignorance even when masked by anonymous commenters.