How Israel’s plan to enter Gaza ignores the lessons of history and will only lead to tears
THE LAST WORD | Andrew M. Mwenda | Israel is preparing a ground invasion of Gaza in a vain effort to destroy Hamas. It is incredible how stupid human beings can be, especially our inability to learn from history. In 1982, Israel invaded Lebanon to destroy the PLO and remove Syrian influence from that country. Initially, the operation seemed a success as a surrounded PLO left Beirut and relocated to Tripoli, Syrian influence was neutralised and Israel installed a friendly government in Beirut led by her Christian allies. However, when a pro-Israel president was assassinated, Israel’s position in Beirut became untenable and her forces withdrew to Southern Lebanon.
Then things began to take a nosedive. New resistance emerged. Islamic militants launched guerrilla attacks against Israel forces. The conflict was too twisted to revisit here. But suffice it to say that with time, the civil war in Lebanon intensified, new factors and combinations came into play. In May 2000, Israel withdrew from Southern Lebanon. The Christian army it had trained, armed and financed for 18 years fell within days to Hezbollah, a radical extremist Islamic movement and a mortal enemy of Israel. By this time, Syria had regained complete dominance in Lebanon. Does anyone in Tel Aviv remember these events?
This delusion, that because you are powerful you can invade and occupy a country easily led Americans into Vietnam. For 15 years, it bombed that country with relentless abandon, killing and maiming millions of its citizens. At the height of this effort, America had half a million troops in Vietnam. North Vietnam was supplying the rebels (Vietcong) in the south using what was known as the Ho Chi Minh trail which passed through the little neighboring country called Laos. America determined to destroy this trail. It threw more bombs on Laos than those dropped during the entire Second World War. The Ho Chi Minh Trail was never destroyed. America withdrew from Vietnam a militarily defeated and politically exhausted country.
The lessons of Vietnam seemed to have sunk into American political consciousness for decades. The U.S. did not invade and occupy another country for almost three decades until in 2001 when it went into Afghanistan and in 2003 went into Iraq. Both occupations brought only tears to America and Washington, in spite of her enormous resources, withdrew from both countries defeated. Meanwhile, the enemy the U.S. claimed to have gone to fight and destroy in Afghanistan, the Taliban, grew stronger. America had no option but to sign a surrender agreement with the Taliban. After 20 years of occupation, it withdrew leaving the Taliban to take over the country.
In Iraq, America went there claiming to fight the forces of terrorism. After ten years of occupation, it left behind a highly radicalised country, gave birth to ISIS and strengthened Iran’s hand in the region. Except for the initial shock and awe that characterised the U.S. “victory” in Iraq, it is difficult to see any other victory America got in the Middle East. Yet this did not stop the USA from invading Libya, toppling Col. Muammar Gadaffi and leaving the country in ruins, ruled by a motley of terrorists. Now America is encouraging Israel with a ground invasion of Gaza to eliminate Hamas.
The mighty USSR went into Afghanistan in 1979 and secured a quick victory, occupying the entire country. Nine years later, it withdrew exhausted. Last year I argued with friends that Russian President Vladmir Putin would NEVER seek to invade and occupy the whole of Ukraine, even as his military armada closed in Kiev. The best he would do is occupy the east whose people feel close to Russia, most of them are ethnic Russian or speak Russian. Is it possible that Putin could have deluded himself that he can have an easy victory and occupy the entire Ukraine? We do not know. But if he tried, it would have been the worst decision of his life.
Uganda is also following in these footsteps in Somalia. In 2012, our government took a decision to kick Al Shabab out of Mogadishu. The aim was to stabilise the country, protect its people against Al Shabab “terrorists” and shift the transitional Somali government from Nairobi to Mogadishu. Initially, UPDF seemed to achieve this grandiose objective. But this was only the calm before the storm. Today, with five countries (Kenya, Ethiopia, Burundi, Djibouti and Uganda) occupying Somalia, Al Shabab has grown bigger, stronger and better organised. The AU and her allies can postpone but cannot stop the takeover of Somalia by Al Shabab.
This brings me back to Israel and her plans to invade Gaza to destroy Hamas. History should be Israel’s guide but it seems the decision makers in Tel Aviv are reading a different script. There will be no victory for Israel in Gaza, only a protracted occupation that will leave Tel Aviv exhausted, internally divided and internationally isolated. The only way Israel can destroy Hamas is to launch a brutal, scorched earth policy in Gaza and kill every Palestinian there, or at least 90% of them. In short, only a genocide can guarantee victory. And Israel can learn from the USA, Canada and Australia where settler colonialists killed most of the indigenous people and pushed the remaining few into “native reserves.”
There was a time when colonial powers invaded and occupied other countries for decades at low cost. But that was 18th and 19th centuries. A major development from modern Western civilization (which dates beginning around 1800) has two interconnected dimensions: the first is the political awakening of the masses; the second is the rise of nationalism. Political awakening was occasioned by urbanisation and mass education; nationalism was a result of growing self-awareness leading to politicisation of identity. An idea emerged in Europe that every nation, really an “imagined community” must have a state of their own and the members of that community must enjoy freedom to govern themselves.
For millennia, human beings had largely been governed under empires, which were multi ethnic. Now every ethnic group came to demand a “nation-state.” The creation of a nation-state went hand in hand with ethnic cleaning – the forceful eviction or elimination of those deemed not to belong. The state of Israel itself was created through ethnic cleansing of Jews out of Europe during the holocaust and then mass migration to Palestine. The very creation a Jewish state, based on the expropriation of Palestinian lands, created a Palestinian identity and hence Palestinian national consciousness. This is the animal Israel is fighting, not Hamas.
******
amwenda@independent.co.ug
Your argument focuses on historical examples of military invasions and occupations that led to unintended consequences and difficulties for the occupying forces. While it’s crucial to learn from history, and indeed history offers many valuable lessons, it’s also important to address the context and specifics of the situation at hand.
Complexity of Regional Conflicts: The situation in Gaza is undoubtedly complex, but it differs from previous conflicts in several key ways. Rather than simply a military campaign, Israel’s challenges include addressing ongoing security concerns, humanitarian issues, and political considerations. It’s not an exact parallel to past conflicts.
Changed Strategies and International Diplomacy: Nations learn from their past mistakes. Israeli military strategies have evolved, and they are often accompanied by diplomatic efforts. Israel seeks to weaken Hamas’s military capabilities to enhance security while engaging in international diplomacy to resolve the underlying issues.
Avoiding an All-or-Nothing Approach: The characterization of victory as total annihilation isn’t an accurate reflection of Israel’s strategy. Israel’s military operations are often aimed at dismantling Hamas’s military infrastructure rather than targeting the entire population. Recognizing this distinction is vital.
Lessons from Counter-Terrorism Efforts: Israel has a long history of dealing with security threats and has gathered valuable experience in counter-terrorism. Its efforts are often aimed at weakening terrorist organizations, rather than causing widespread civilian casualties.
Civilian Casualties: Concerns about civilian casualties should not be dismissed. Israel, like any nation, should aim to minimize harm to civilians in its military operations. Public sentiment and international opinion can have a significant impact on the outcome of such conflicts.
It’s essential to recognize that your argument focuses on historical examples of military invasions and occupations that led to unintended consequences and difficulties for the occupying forces. While it’s crucial to learn from history, and indeed history offers many valuable lessons, it’s also important to address the context and specifics of the situation at hand.
Complexity of Regional Conflicts: The situation in Gaza is undoubtedly complex, but it differs from previous conflicts in several key ways. Rather than simply a military campaign, Israel’s challenges include addressing ongoing security concerns, humanitarian issues, and political considerations. It’s not an exact parallel to past conflicts.
Changed Strategies and International Diplomacy: Nations learn from their past mistakes. Israeli military strategies have evolved, and they are often accompanied by diplomatic efforts. Israel seeks to weaken Hamas’s military capabilities to enhance security while engaging in international diplomacy to resolve the underlying issues.
Avoiding an All-or-Nothing Approach: The characterization of victory as total annihilation isn’t an accurate reflection of Israel’s strategy. Israel’s military operations are often aimed at dismantling Hamas’s military infrastructure rather than targeting the entire population. Recognizing this distinction is vital.
Lessons from Counter-Terrorism Efforts: Israel has a long history of dealing with security threats and has gathered valuable experience in counter-terrorism. Its efforts are often aimed at weakening terrorist organizations, rather than causing widespread civilian casualties.
Civilian Casualties: Concerns about civilian casualties should not be dismissed. Israel, like any nation, should aim to minimize harm to civilians in its military operations. Public sentiment and international opinion can have a significant impact on the outcome of such conflicts.
With all due respect, you either choose to ignore the cause of this current crisis, and also know that Israel will forever be at war that will eventually culminate to Armageddon.
You need to read and study Scripture if you are to correctly decipher that that is related and pertains to Israel.
With all due respect to you David my brother.
This issue has nothing to do with scripture. The terrorists we should condemn are Israeli terrorrists. Israeli terrorrists have targeted and murdered dozens of journalists covering their barbaric atrocities, bombed children, women and civilians in hospitals, churches and mosques, hundreds of thousands of them in the past 75 years. Israeli terrorists have forcibly displaced civilians from their homes and have in addition been bombing the fleeing civilians. These are terrorist acts. These are not acts from the so-called chosen “children of God”. Let’s not get this twisted, these are acts of an evil regime and should be roundly condemned.
Your simplicity and shallow analysis is real. What happened to the nuclear weapons you were you were concerned about with Russian unleashing? What happened to your $10,000 bet on Kagame not extending the term limit even as you argued, that Rwandese wanted him to stay. What happened to you analysis of Museveni stepping down from presidency? I recall you went to an extent of asking onyango obbo to write an article in which he trashed your thinking. How about when you started lamenting that Bobi wine was campaigning during Covid times and he didn’t care to expose Ugandans to it and kill them. Then came Mao and your excitement that he would cause change with in. The list is endless but to emphasize how shallow you can become!
Enter Israel. You seem to highlight that Gaza and most of Israel belong to Palestinians and you make no mention of a country that belongs to them? Did the Jews to you fall from Mars? What about their long history detailed in the Old Testament? Finally, and you need to take note of this: Politics is not about completely stopping or eliminating the opponent but about postponing. That way things can be looked into and negotiated and during that time so much blood can be shed, especially when dealing with crazy situations.
Sakorzy was responsible for the wests incursion into Libya. This conflict happened in real time, we got daily updates from from news agencies. It amazes me that only a decade later that history is marred up with inaccuracies. Of the 15 un security members, only 4 including 2 permanent members abstained in the vote for military action, even majority of AU and Arab league members favoured military action against Gaddafi. But it has to be the usual bully America to blame for every invasion.