Agriculture versus industry
Martin Kyeyune, the economic and finance advisor of Roofings Group, the largest producers of steel in Uganda, says if the government’s plan to tap into the manufacturing sector to provide jobs is to work, the government needs to support industries that are already in operation to start producing at full capacity. He says some industries around Kampala are operating at about 55% of installed capacity.
Kyeyune wants the ‘Buy-local-Build Uganda’ campaign promoted urgently if manufacturing locally without a market does not make sense.
“When you manufacture goods and they struggle to get a market locally, you can’t create more jobs because no one is making money out of manufacturing,” he says.
He mentions other bottlenecks; including the high cost of capital and unreliable, poor distribution, and costly energy. He says although the government has done well in improving the generation side by building power dams like Bujagali, Karuma and Isimba, the distribution and transmission need to be improved.
“We cannot continue having power surges which constantly affect machinery. That makes manufacturing costly,” he says.
Kyeyune advocates a deliberate strategy from the government to attract industries that have both backward and forward linkages in the agriculture sector. He says that would create more jobs than any other sector. To lower cost of production, he says completing the Standard Gauge Railway is very critical.
He says comparatively, Ugandan manufacturers spend about US cents 8-10 per tonne/kilometre. In comparison, he says manufacturers in China and Egypt spend as low as US 5 cents per tonne/kilometre.
Astrid Haas, the Country Economist for South Sudan and Uganda at the London School of Economics and Political Science’s International Growth Centre has also weighed up Uganda’s chances of breaking into the middle income bracket in just five years.
Writing in The Huffington Post recently, Haas said in order to achieve faster growth and development; Uganda must move workers from agriculture into manufacturing.
“The medium term challenge is to accelerate the pace of moving workers from jobs in agriculture and the informal sector into modern industries.”
Haas said Uganda’s rapid economic growth in the last two decades has been largely helped by external factors; debt relief, high commodity prices, ample donor funds, and relative low borrowing costs.
Haas’ views resonate with Muhumuza who says the structure of the economy would have to change from the current state where more than 70% of the population is squeezed in agriculture which contributes only about 20% of GDP. Unless there is structural change, Muhumuza says, “Even if the economy grows, it will be through stock assets like roads and railways and sectors that exclude majority of the people.”
Muhumuza says if Ugandans remain excluded from the formal economy by limited access to land, skills, high value inputs, and finance, the productivity of both people and assets will be so low that the trajectory to middle income status will not be reached.
According to the 2014 national population report, close to 70% of homesteads are still engaged in subsistence agriculture—the same number that was reported 26 years ago.
But other economists, like Makerere University Business School Professor, Lawrence Bategeka, who is the incoming MP for Hoima Municipality, the government could, in fact spur rapid growth in the economy, if it focuses on agricultural produce for export.
Comparing Uganda and Vietnam— both coffee producers— Bategeka says by 1990, when Vietnam was producing and selling about one million bags of coffee, Uganda was selling about three million bags of coffee.
But thanks to Vietnam’s rapid deployment of technology on the farm, the Southeast Asian nation now produces about 30 million bags.
“That is more money than Uganda is going to earn from oil,” he says. Unfortunately, Uganda remains stuck at 3.5 million bags of coffee for export. To achieve the Vietnam-style transformation, Bategeka says, Ugandan attitudes to work must also change.
“Our demographics may not be favourable as 60% of the population is children and therefore they don’t work,” he said, “but we need to focus more on production and the population needs to engage in meaningful production.
“Uganda still has big patches of arable land and so the government should engage the rural population by identifying a few export crops.
“Even then, there is need to re-organize farmers to ensure that they benefit from the whole value chain within the agricultural sector.”
Bategeka says the most pressing challenges as the economy expands, lie in the energy sector, roads, and transforming the agriculture sector.
“We are on the right track but more needs to be done. We already have a liberalised economy and a well-established private sector; we now need to tap into the energies of individuals and firms,” he told The Independent.
It is as imposible an it be to attain a middle income status in 2020, but anyway why doesn’t the presedendent concentrate on knowledge creation rather than chase wild dreams that may not materialise soon, wealth creation can not create knowledge but knowledge can create wealthy. So forget middle income status and first concentrate on knowledge creation.
Oil money should be seen as a bonus that will compliment growth, but not a key driver to growth, it is only strategic abilities that will give uganda strategic competence which will then put the country in a competitive position, this will eventually lead to gaining a competitive advantage over our neighbours in trading.
THIS is just something else to use to hang onto power citing “unfinished business”.As Bantu rightly says , we have had “comparative advantage” that we have not made use of for the last 30 years and now we are talking about KIIRA cars.That informs the strategy we have and as they say ” a fortune in the hands of a fool is a big MISFORTUNE”. From “MY OIL” we are now talking about “our oil” which leaves one to wonder when the transformation took place, because I have not heard of a flotation of shares whereby the hitherto private company of M 7 OIL SARL floated its shares and THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA bought some.
OIL or no oil, I do not see us going anywhere in a hurry ,unless there is a change of management.
Leadership is about inspiration and maintaining confidence of he followers. For the faithful both inside and outside the country who can be inspired to strategies and work hard -not speculation; and depending on their numbers plus their abilities, it is a possible goal to achieve and be in the middle income bracket soon. Even if we missed the target, but having stretched as much as possible, that would still be ok. Everyone aspires to be rich. Let him go on the work of positive mobilizing of ALL including the opposition to participate effectively. We might attain.
You guys, I salute you both kamanyire and ejakait, for your input in these forums, also say keep it up, you are doing good job, to open people’s eyes, and I like it that your always active debenting and commenting.